Sunday, December 27, 2009

HUMAN TERRAIN WORKERS FEDERALIZED

"... Since the inception of the project in 2006... interpreters, researchers and managers, deployed overseas (in Iraq and Afghanistan) as part of the Army’s social science program, the Human Terrain System... have been generously-paid contractors, serving as cultural counselors to combat units... (Now) they’re all becoming government employees... Which means that Human Terrain pay is suddenly not all that generous. One linguist, previously pulling in an annual salary $270,000, will now make about $91,000 — if that person continues his warzone work for the Human Terrain project... The dollar amount reduction is more than 60%... the switch was ostensibly triggered by the American military’s new Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government. The pact, which went into effect in January, gives Baghdad officials broad new powers to control contractors on their soil (but not U.S. civil servants)..."
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/02/more-hts-mania

Saturday, December 26, 2009

U.S. SHOULD HAVE LET TALIBAN SURRENDER AL QAEDA

"... In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, the United States government decided to respond militarily, and began to prepare its armed forces to overthrow the Taliban regime it believed was harboring al-Qaeda. Before the United States attacked, it offered Taliban leader Mullah Omar a chance to surrender bin Laden and his top associates. The first forces to be inserted into Afghanistan were Paramilitary Officers from the CIA's elite Special Activities Division (SAD).
The Taliban offered to turn over bin Laden to a neutral country for trial if the United States would provide evidence of bin Laden's complicity in the attacks. U.S. President George W. Bush responded by saying: "We know he's guilty. Turn him over", and British Prime Minister Tony Blair warned the Taliban regime: "Surrender bin Laden, or surrender power". Soon thereafter the United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan..."
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda#September_11_attacks


"... After 9/11, the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar, assembled a council of clerics to judge his claim that Mr. bin Laden was the country’s guest and could not be surrendered. The clerics countered that because a guest should not cause his host problems, Mr. bin Laden should leave. But instead of keeping pressure on the Taliban to resolve the issue in ways they could live with, the United States ridiculed their deliberation and bombed them into a closer alliance with Al Qaeda. Pakistani Pashtuns then offered to help out their Afghan brethren..."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/opinion/13atran.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=scott%20Atran&st=cse

Saturday, December 19, 2009

AFGHAN SECURITY FORCES TO COST U.S. $10 BILLION PER YEAR

"... Gen. David H. Petraeus,... estimated that building and maintaining a combined army and police force of 400,000 — a size that American commanders believe may eventually be needed to fully secure the country — would cost more than $10 billion a year... (He said) “There’s no question... that Afghanistan will require substantial international funding for years to come in a whole host of different areas, not the least of which is their security forces.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/10/general-david-petraeus-wa_n_387371.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/10/world/asia/10policy.html?ref=world

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

OBAMA IGNORES TALIBAN OFFER ON AFGHANISTAN

"The Barack Obama administration is refusing to acknowledge an offer by the leadership of the Taliban in early December to give "legal guarantees" that it will not allow Afghanistan to be used for attacks on other countries... The Taliban... has chosen to interpret the Obama administration's position as one of rejection of its offer. The Taliban offer, included in a statement dated Dec. 4 and e-mailed to news organizations the following day, said the organization has "no agenda of meddling in the internal affairs of other countries and is ready to give legal guarantees if foreign forces withdraw from Afghanistan". The statement did not mention al Qaeda by name or elaborate on what was meant by "legal guarantees" against such "meddling", but it was an obvious response to past U.S. insistence that the U.S. war in Afghanistan is necessary to prevent al Qaeda from having a safe haven in Afghanistan once again. It suggested that the Taliban is interested in negotiating an agreement with the United States involving a public Taliban renunciation of ties with al Qaeda..."
http://www.ipsnews.net/login.asp?redir=news.asp?idnews=49701
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/16

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

U.S. TO BUILD AFGHAN ARMY FOR 5 YEARS, PAY IT FOR 15 YEARS

"... Afghan President Hamid Karzai said it may be five years before his army is ready to take on insurgents — a blunt warning that the planned exit strategy for U.S. troops from Afghanistan 18 months from now could grind slowly through 2014.
Karzai also said it will be at least 15 years before his government can bankroll a security force strong enough to protect the country from the threat of insurgency...."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091208/ap_on_re_as/as_gates_afghanistan

Monday, December 7, 2009

FT. HOOD SHOOTER BOTHERED BY WAR CRIMES

"... In the weeks before the rampage, the accused gunman, Maj. Nidal M. Hassan, an Army psychiatrist, told colleagues and Army lawyers that he wanted to report soldiers who had admitted in counseling sessions that they witnessed or committed war crimes in Iraq or Afghanistan. War crimes can include acts like torture, murder, sexual assault and cruel treatment. Though Major Hasan was discouraged from filing reports on his patients, military officials say, he would have been within his rights as an Army psychiatrist to have done so. Major Hasan’s efforts to report war crimes were first reported by ABC News..."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/us/07therapists.html?_r=1&sudsredirect=true

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

RAPE IN AFGHANISTAN A PROFOUND PROBLEM

"Rape in Afghanistan is under-reported, concealed and a human rights problem of "profound proportions"... field research conducted late last year and early this year found rape affected all parts of Afghanistan, across all communities and social groups.... Women and girls are at risk of rape in their homes, in their villages and in detention facilities... Rape occurs within the family and beyond and victims are often prosecuted for committing adultery..."
http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Afghanistan-Pakistan/idUSTRE5AT26N20091130